Yearn vs Beefy: Which Yield Aggregator Wins in 2026?

By DifiCalc Research Team · Published Sep 10, 2026 · Reviewed Sep 10, 2026

TL;DR — the quick verdict. Both launched in 2020 with three audits, but they optimized for different users. Yearn is the deeper, more sophisticated vault manager — about $8.4B TVL, mostly Ethereum and its major L2s, typical net APY around 7.5% — and suits larger, longer-horizon positions. Beefy covers 10+ chains (including BSC and smaller L2s), has no management fee, and shows a wider 3–45% APY spread with a typical ~12%, suiting users who chase newer-chain emission yields and want the simplest auto-compound UX.

  Yearn FinanceBeefy Finance
Founded 20202020
TVL (reviewed Sep 2026) ≈ $8.4B≈ $1.2B
Main chains Ethereum, Arbitrum, Optimism, Polygon, Base10+ chains incl. BSC, Avalanche, Fantom and major L2s
Audits 3 public audits3 public audits
Fees 0.5–2% management + 20% performance; 0% withdrawalNo management fee; 0.5–4.5% performance per vault; 0% withdrawal
Typical APY range ~4–18%, typical ~7.5%~3–45%, typical ~12% (emission-driven vaults included)
DifiCalc risk grade AA
Best for Larger positions, Ethereum-core users, strategy depthMulti-chain reach, small positions, simple auto-compounding
Full review Yearn reviewBeefy review

TVL and APY figures reviewed Sep 10, 2026 against live data and protocol documentation; rates move daily — verify current numbers before depositing. See our review methodology.

How the two models differ

Yearn writes and runs its own multi-protocol strategies with dedicated strategists and a risk framework; vaults route funds across lending markets and LP positions and are continuously tuned. Beefy is primarily an auto-compounding layer: its vaults wrap third-party farms and pools and repeatedly harvest-and-reinvest rewards, with a much larger catalogue of vaults spread across many chains.

In practice that means Yearn concentrates capital into fewer, deeper, more managed strategies, while Beefy gives breadth — thousands of vaults, including long-tail and newer-chain farms that carry higher failure and decay risk.

Fees and what you actually earn

Yearn charges a management fee (typically 0.5–2%) plus 20% of yield; Beefy charges no management fee but a per-vault performance fee between roughly 0.5% and 4.5%. Headline APY shown in both interfaces is generally already net of these fees, but Beefy vaults with 4%+ fees need noticeably higher gross yield just to match a low-fee Yearn vault.

The apparent Beefy APY advantage often comes from newer-chain token emissions, not higher base fees. Compare the base component in the stablecoin APY tracker before annualizing a 30% number.

Security, track record and risk

Both protocols have operated since 2020 with three public audits and survived multiple market cycles; both earn an A grade in our methodology. Yearn's larger TVL and longer history of complex strategy upgrades make it the conservative default; Beefy's risk is more vault-specific — strategy quality varies across its long catalogue, and legacy low-TVL vaults should be avoided.

On Ethereum mainnet, Yearn gas costs can erode small positions; Beefy's L2 and alt-chain presence makes frequent auto-compounding cheap, but moves smart-contract risk onto younger chains and farms.

Who should choose which

How to choose in 4 steps

  1. Decide which chain your capital lives on — Yearn is Ethereum/L2-centric, Beefy covers BSC and most alt-L1/L2s.
  2. Shortlist 2–3 vaults for the same asset and open each vault's strategy page to see where the yield comes from (lending fees, LP fees or token emissions).
  3. Compare net APY in the DifiCalc tracker, subtracting the performance fee and mainnet gas if you compound manually.
  4. Prefer vaults with millions in TVL and recent activity, check the protocol's risk grade, and size satellite-vault exposure smaller than core positions.

Frequently asked questions

Which is safer, Yearn or Beefy?

Both launched in 2020, carry three public audits and earn an A risk grade from DifiCalc. Yearn has roughly 7x the TVL and a longer record of managing complex strategies, making it the conservative default. Beefy's biggest risk variation sits at the individual-vault level because its catalogue is far larger and includes long-tail farms.

Why does Beefy show higher APY than Yearn?

Mostly because Beefy indexes newer-chain and emission-heavy farms whose headline rates include token rewards that decay quickly. Yearn's displayed APY leans more on base lending and trading-fee yield, which is lower but more durable. Always compare the base-APY column rather than the headline.

Are fees deducted automatically?

Yes. Both protocols deduct management and/or performance fees automatically inside the vault; the APY shown is normally net of fees. Check the specific vault's fee tier, because Beefy performance fees range from about 0.5% to 4.5%.

Can I use both aggregators at once?

Yes — a common setup is core stablecoin and blue-chip exposure on Yearn over Ethereum/Arbitrum/Base, with smaller satellite positions auto-compounding through Beefy on BSC, Avalanche or newer L2s.

Do either protocol protect me from impermanent loss?

No. Vaults built on LP positions still pass impermanent loss through to depositors; the aggregator compounds rewards but cannot cancel price divergence. Single-asset lending vaults avoid IL entirely; model LP exposure with the DifiCalc impermanent-loss calculator first.

Sources and further reading

Yearn full review Beefy full review Live APY tracker Best stablecoin yield 2026
⚠️ This comparison is informational, not financial advice. Variable rates, smart-contract risk and (for LP positions) impermanent loss remain. Never deposit more than you can afford to lose.